Decision question
Should the business optimise the current application landscape, modernise a core platform, or complement it with specialist capabilities?
SAMPLE OUTPUT · NOT A CUSTOMER REPORT
Evidence before investment.
This illustrative brief shows how AutomationScan is intended to turn business inputs into a decision-ready discovery plan. All names, figures and findings below are fictional.
ILLUSTRATIVE DECISION PACK
What a completed brief can look like.
All values below are fictional. They demonstrate structure, not benchmark accuracy.
Evidence registerSample only
| Claim | Type | Confidence | Next proof |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 applications are in scope | Uploaded | High | Reconcile inventory |
| 4 applications have unclear ownership | System derived | Medium | Owner confirmation |
| Renewal exposure may exist | Assumption | Low | Contract review |
Decision confidenceNot a score
12Apps in scope
9Evidence-linked
3Validation gaps
4Scenario paths
Evidence register
User-stated process observations are separated from uploaded records, sourced vendor claims, calculations and assumptions.
Key gap
Application renewal dates and actual licence utilisation are incomplete. This is an evidence gap—not proof of overspend.
Scenario set
Stay / optimise, modernise / extend, complement and replace are compared against the customer's stated requirements.
Validation gates
Confirm integration effort, security controls, localisation, process fit, commercial terms and migration complexity through evidence.
90-day action plan
Collect application and spend records, validate the highest-impact process, run supplier demonstrations and document decision gates.
IMPORTANT
This is a sample, not proof of product accuracy.
A real brief should be generated from the organisation's own evidence and clearly distinguish facts, calculations, assumptions and external claims. Vendor information must be checked against current documentation and contractual terms.